[Shared decision-making using outcome information: qualitative research among patients]. / Samen beslissen met ROM als informatiebron: kwalitatief onderzoek onder cliënten.

BACKGROUND: In the period 2019-2022, eight mental health care organizations have been working on the development and implementation of shared decision-making (SDM) using routine outcome monitoring (ROM) as a source of information. AIM: To obtain insight in needs and experiences of patients among SDM using ROM, and to investigate which implementation approach this requires. METHOD: Explorative, qualitative research consisting of semi-structured interviews and focusgroups with patients (n = 101) treated by mental health care organizations across the Netherlands. RESULTS: Patients reported SDM as important. Generic aspects (listening, trust, complete information and equal input) and customization (connecting to the need for help, and for every decision meta-communication about the roles of patients, relatives and clinicians and the way of giving information) were equally important. Patients valued ROM as source of information during SDM, providing that questionnaires are not too long, are related to the problems and results are discussed. CONCLUSION: SDM using ROM is as yet not widely implemented in mental health care. This requires continuous stimulation and evaluation. Implementation requires (re)training clinicians and supporting patients by relatives, peer experts and psycho-education. Patients appreciate ROM as an aid in SDM; access to their own ROM is helpful here.

[ROM for the elderly: a prospective cohort study of the outcomes on the HoNOS 65+ in various diagnostic groups]. / ROM bij ouderen: een prospectief cohortonderzoek naar de uitkomsten op de HoNOS 65+ bij verschillende diagnosegroepen.

BACKGROUND: Routine outcome monitoring (rom) provides us with opportunities to study treatment outcome in daily clinical practice and to learn from the results.
AIM: To assess the changes that occur in the psychological and social functioning of patients in geriatric psychiatry who are suffering from substance dependence, mood disorder, anxiety disorder, psychotic disorder, or personality disorder.
METHOD: We analysed data relating to 1,810 patients (aged 60-101) from nine mental health care organisations that together form SynQuest cv. The total scores and item scores on the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for older people (Honos 65+) at the beginning and end of treatment were also analysed and were linked to the diagnosis.
RESULTS: Patients improved significantly (es=0.8). The degree of improvement depended on the patient's principal diagnosis; patients with a mood or anxiety disorder improved the most (es=1.0 and 0.8). The degree of improvement varied per Honos 65+ item. In particular, patients with 'depressive problems' and 'other mental and behavioral problems' showed considerable improvement.
CONCLUSION: Many older patients benefited from the treatment they received in gerontopsychiatry departments. This helps to give elderly patients with psychiatric disorders hope for the future. The scores on the individual items of the Honos 65+ can help clinicians to tailor treatment to the patient's specific problems and to monitor and evaluate treatment outcome in conjunction with the patient.